|
|
Quang
Nguyen |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Extremist Republican member of the Arizona
House of Representatives for District 1 since 2021.
The district includes most of Yavapai County and
some of Maricopa County. He won another
term in the 2022 election. Amid the COVID-19
pandemic in Arizona, Nguyen signed onto a letter
urging Governor
Doug Ducey to punish school
districts that enforce a mask mandate on students.
Nguyen is anti-abortion and anti-vaccine card.
Nguyen
is a member of the "Oath
Keepers",
an alt-right anti-government militia whose members
took part in the 2021 U.S. Capitol insurrection. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Rep. Quang Nguyen
Is Unfit To Lead This Crucial
Legislative Committee |
| |
"Arizona
cannot move beyond the partisan
extremism of the past eight
years if the Republican Party
continues to place extremists
into positions of power in our
state.
Voters’ rejection of hardline
extremists for Arizona’s U.S.
Senate seat, governor, secretary
of state and attorney general
should have made this clear.
However, House Speaker-elect
Ben
Toma is clearly not listening.
His appointment of Rep. Quang
Nguyen of Prescott, an admitted
member of the antigovernment
group the
Oath Keepers, as chair
of the House Judiciary Committee
sends a dangerous message of
support to the extremists in his
party and is a direct insult to
the rule of law. |
| |
|
Nguyen is a member of the Oath
Keepers |
|
|
|
[ . . . ] |
|
|
| The
Judiciary Committee is
responsible for vetting most, if
not all of the proposed bills
impacting the fair
administration of justice in our
state. This can include such
important topics as new criminal
statutes, victims’ rights,
individual rights, criminal
sentencing and policing, just to
name a few. |
|
|
|
[ . . . ] |
|
|
| Simply
put,
Nguyen’s membership in the Oath Keepers should disqualify
him as a member of all House
committees. However, placing him
in charge of the Judiciary
Committee is a grave insult to
our democracy and the rule of
law." |
|
|
|
|
Dec. 6, 2022
Source |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
|
2022 Survey
Questions For
Arizona Candidates |
|
|
|
Position Sought:
State
Representative
District
1 |
|
|
|
Question 2: Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” or “gender expression” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in nondiscrimination law. |
 |
|
Candidates'
Position:
Oppose. |
|
|
|
Question 4: Allowing biological males that identify as transgender to play on female sports’ teams. |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Oppose |
|
|
|
Question 8: Allowing parents to seek professional counseling for their minor child with same-sex attraction or gender identity issues.* |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Support |
|
|
|
Question 9:
Protecting individuals and
businesses from being required
to provide services or use their
artistic expression in a manner
that violates their moral or
religious beliefs.** |
|
|
|
Candidates' Position:
Support. |
|
|
|
*
This is in reference to the
dangerous and disproven
"Reparative Therapy". |
|
**Discriminatory
"Religious Freedom" laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
In other words,
as PROVEN by this bill, Republicans and
ammosexuals find it wrong to discriminate
against inanimate objects but have no
problem discriminating against people. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOP Lawmakers Ask
Gov. Ducey To
Withhold Funding
From School
Districts Mandating
Masks |
|
Several prominent
Arizona Republicans
issued a joint
letter Wednesday
afternoon asking
Gov.
Doug Ducey to
withhold funding and
begin legal action
against school
districts that are
not following state
laws. |
|
Aug. 11, 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
|
2020 Survey
Questions For
Arizona Candidates |
|
|
|
Position Sought:
State Representative LD-1 |
|
|
|
Question 2:
Adding “sexual orientation,”
“gender identity,” or “gender
expression” to the protected
classes of race, religion, age,
sex, and ancestry in
nondiscrimination law. |
|
|
Candidates'
Position:
Oppose |
|
|
|
Question 4:
Allowing biological males that
identify as transgender to play
on female sports’ teams. |
|
|
Candidates'
Position:
Oppose |
|
|
|
Question 11:
Protecting individuals and
businesses from being required
to provide services or use their
artistic expression in a manner
that violates their moral or
religious beliefs.* |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Support |
|
|
|
*
Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
