|
|
David Schweikert |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
David
Schweikert
(Republican
Party)
is a
member
of the
U.S.
House,
representing
Arizona's
6th
Congressional
District.
He
assumed
office
on
January
5, 2011.
His
current
term
ends on
January
3, 2023.
Schweikert
ran for
re-election
to the
U.S.
House to
represent
Arizona's
6th
Congressional
District.
He won
in the
general
election
on
November
3, 2020.
After
two
unsuccessful
congressional
runs in
1994 and
2008,
Schweikert
was
first
elected
to the
chamber
in 2010.
Schweikert
began
his
political
career
in the
Arizona
House of
Representatives
from
1991 to
1995. He
became
majority
whip in
his
second
term. |
|
Sources:
Wikipedia,
Ballotpedia & Vote
Smart |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fanatical Republican
Extremist Of The
Day: David
Schweikert- 2022
Update |
|
"On this date in
2014, 2015, 2016,
2017, 2018, 2019,
2020, as well as
2021, “Fanatical
Republican Extremist
of the Day”
published profiles
of the U.S. House
Representative from
Arizona’s 6th
Congressional
District, David
Schweikert, a former
real estate vulture
capitalist
arch-conservative
who consistently
votes to repeal the
Affordable Care Act,
defund Planned
Parenthood, fails to
understand how the
debt ceiling works,
referred to the 2013
Government Shutdown
as “my idea of fun”,
and was once
recorded on video
high-fiving Rep. Ben
Quayle on the floor
of the house after
denying a pay
increase to active
duty soldiers
fighting the War on
Terror." |
|
Oct. 55, 2022 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Rep. David
Schweikert, Allies
Sued Over Ads
Implying Opponent Is
Gay |
|
"It should come as
no surprise that a
politician who
knowingly and
willfully lied about
committing bank
fraud, money
laundering and a
host of other
serious crimes is
willing to do and
say anything, no
matter how
despicable, to save
his 30-year
political career." |
|
Jul. 12, 2022 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
|
2022
Candidate
Questionnaire |
|
|
|
Position Sought:
U.S.
House of
Representatives
CD-1 |
|
|
| Question
4: Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” and “gender expression” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in nondiscrimination law. |
 |
| Candidates'
Position: Oppose. |
|
|
| Question
9: Protecting individuals and businesses from being required to provide services or use their artistic expression in a manner that violates their moral or religious beliefs.* |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Support. |
|
|
|
* Discriminatory
"Religious Freedom" laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOP Congressman
Schweikert Faces
Voters
After $125,000
Federal Fine
|
|
"recently, the GOP
congressman agreed
to pay a $125,000
fine to the Federal
Elections
Commission, stemming
from a campaign
finance blunder
nearly a decade ago.
Regulators found
that he improperly
spent money on such
expenses as fancy
dinners, gifts, and
airline upgrades." |
|
Feb. 18, 2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona's Congressional Republicans Oppose Creating Bipartisan
Jan. 6 Commission |
|
"House Democrats, aided by 35 Republicans,
voted 252-175 to pass a bill to create a 10-member commission.
[...] Biggs was joined in voting no Wednesday by fellow Arizona
Republicans Paul Gosar, Debbie Lesko and David Schweikert, all
three of whom are Freedom Caucus members." |
|
May 19, 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Car Insurer Warns
Rep.
David
Schweikert Over
Campaign Attack |
|
"The pushback is an
early sign of a
potentially heated
primary for
Schweikert, who
hasn't faced any
significant
challenge from a
fellow Republican
since winning his
Scottsdale-based 6th
Congressional
District seat over
then-Rep. Ben
Quayle, R-Ariz.,
when the district
was created in
2012." |
|
May 28, 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reps. Debbie Lesko,
David Schweikert Mum
On Money From Rep.
Matt Gaetz Of
Florida |
|
Apr. 6, 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,009,832 Voters Created Arizona's 4 QAnon Quacks |
|
Feb. 7, 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't Let Rep. David Schweikert Weasel Out Of His Liability In The Failed Coup Attempt |
|
Jan. 13, 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Biggs, Gosar, And
Schweikert Screw The
People That Voted
For Them Again |
|
Dec. 22, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prominent Republicans Attended Fundraiser At Home Of Abortion Doctor Accused Of Pointing Gun At Pro-Life Protesters |
|
Oct. 27, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
House Of Representatives Formally Reprimands Rep. David Schweikert For Ethics Violations |
|
Jul. 31, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rep. Schweikert Admits To 11 Spending Violations, Will Face Sanction By Full House |
|
Jul. 30, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
|
2020
Candidate
Questionnaire |
|
|
|
Position Sought:
U.S.
House of
Representatives
CD-6 |
|
|
| Question
5: Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” and “gender expression” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in nondiscrimination law. |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Oppose. |
|
|
| Question
12: Adding Protecting individuals and businesses from being required to provide services or use their artistic expression in a manner that violates their moral or religious beliefs.* |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Support. |
|
|
|
*
Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crazy/Stupid Republican Of The Day: David Schweikert - 2019 Update |
|
Oct. 5, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethics Committee Releases More Details On Allegations Against David Schweikert |
|
"Arizona Republican
is already facing
inquiry by House
panel" |
|
Sep. 5, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campaign Records Show GOP Congressman Spent More On Lawyers Than What He Raised |
|
Jul. 16, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
424-Page Report Finds David Schweikert's Office Violated Ethics Rules |
|
"The committee says
neither Schweikert
or Schwab cooperated
with the
investigation." |
|
Jun. 13, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
House Ethics Committee Found 'Substantial Reason' To think Arizona Rep. David Schweikert Broke Rules |
|
Apr. 17, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona Republican Schweikert Runs Up Legal Bills In House Ethics Probe |
|
Apr. 15, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
House Ethics Expands Scope Of Probe Into David Schweikert |
|
Dec. 21, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crazy/Stupid Republican Of The Day: David Schweikert |
|
Oct. 5, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
|
2018
Candidate
Questionnaire |
|
|
|
Position Sought:
U.S. House of
Representatives
CD-6 |
|
|
|
Question
4:
Protecting
individuals
and
businesses
from
being
required
to use
their
artistic
expression
in a
manner
that
violates
their
conscience.* |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Oppose. |
|
|
|
Question
9:
Adding “sexual orientation,”
“gender
identity,”
or
“gender
expression”
to the
protected
classes
of race,
religion,
age,
sex, and
ancestry
in
nondiscrimination
law |
|
|
Candidates'
Position:
Oppose.
|
|
|
|
*
Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US House Investigating Arizona Rep. Schweikert For Ethics Violations |
|
May 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Four Arizona Republicans Vote To Let Puerto
Ricans Die |
|
Oct. 13, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schweikert: Indivisible Groups 'Incite
Violence' And 'Light Cars On Fire' |
|
Jun., 12, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Constituents Bring Cookies, Congressman's
Office Calls Cops |
|
Feb. 24, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
|
2016
Candidate
Questionnaire |
|
|
|
Position Sought:
U.S.
House of
Representatives
CD-6 |
|
|
|
Question
4:
Protecting
individuals
and
businesses
from
being
required
to use
their
artistic
expression
in a
manner
that
violates
their
conscience.* |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Oppose. |
|
|
|
Question
9:
Adding “sexual orientation,”
“gender
identity,”
or
“gender
expression”
to the
protected
classes
of race,
religion,
age,
sex, and
ancestry
in
nondiscrimination
law |
|
|
Candidates'
Position:
Oppose.
|
|
|
|
*
Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Montini: Two
Weeks After Orlando Massacre, Rep.
Schweikert Mocks
Transgender Citizens |
|
Jun.
26, 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rep. Schweikert Compares Unions To Nazis ...
Really |
|
Jun. 12, 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crazy/Stupid Republican Of The Day - David
Schweikert |
|
Oct. 17, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
|
2014
Candidate
Questionnaire |
|
|
|
Position Sought:
U.S.
House of
Representatives
CD-6 |
|
|
| Question 3: Arizona’s voter-approved constitutional definition of marriage should be defended to the fullest extent legally possible. |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Support. |
|
|
| Question 4: Protecting individuals and businesses from being required to provide services or use their artistic expression in a manner that violates their moral or religious beliefs.* |
|
| Candidates' Position: Support. |
|
|
| Question 8: Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” or “gender expression” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in antidiscrimination law. |
|
| Candidates' Position: Oppose. |
|
|
|
*
Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Republican
Lawmaker Ends Government Shutdown Interview
By Saying
‘This Is My Idea Of Fun’ |
|
Oct. 1,
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here Are The Republicans Who Voted 'No' On Hurricane Sandy Relief
Funds |
|
Jan. 4, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David
Schweikert Gives $130,000 To Campaign While
Involved In Real
Estate Loan Scam With Campaign Depository,
Metro Phoenix Bank |
|
Aug.
24, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
|
2012
Candidate
Questionnaire |
|
|
|
Position Sought:
U.S.
House of
Representatives
CD-6 |
|
|
| Question
3: Amending the United States
Constitution to define marriage
as the union of one man and one
woman. |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Support. |
|
|
| Question
8: Adding
“sexual
orientation,”
“gender
identity,”
or
“gender
expression”
to the
protected
classes
of race,
religion,
age,
sex, and
ancestry
in
nondiscrimination
law. |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Oppose. |
|
|
| Question
13: Repealing the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which states that marriage is the union of one man and one woman and declares states do not have to recognize same-sex marriage from other states. |
|
| Candidates' Position: Oppose. |
|
|
|
*
Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona Congressman David Schweikert Falsely
Claims Illegal
Immigrants Are No Longer Afraid |
|
Jul. 5, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FreedomWorks Backs Schweikert Over Quayle |
|
"The
political arm of
FreedomWorks, a Tea
Party group" |
|
May 17, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAIR Game? How GOP Politicians Are Trying to
secretly influence the IRC |
|
Oct. 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How The Tea Party Fared |
|
Nov. 4, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
|
2010
Candidate
Questionnaire |
|
|
|
Position Sought:
U.S. House of
Representatives CD-5 |
|
|
|
Question
5:
Amending the United States Constitution
to
define
marriage
as
between
only one
man and
one
woman. |
|
|
Candidates'
Position:
Support. |
|
|
|
Question
8:
Protecting healthcare workers from being
required to perform procedures that violate
their moral or religious beliefs.* |
|
|
Candidates'
Position:
Support. |
|
|
|
Question
10:
Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender
identity,”
or
“gender
expression”
to the
protected
classes
of race,
religion,
age,
sex, and
ancestry
in
discrimination
law. |
|
|
Candidates'
Position:
Oppose. |
|
|
|
Question
14:
Repealing the federal Defense of Marriage
Act, which states that marriage is the union
of one man and one woman and declares states
do not have to recognize same-sex marriage
from other states. |
|
|
|
Candidates'
Position:
Oppose. |
|
|
|
*
Discriminatory
"Religious
Freedom"
laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
|
2008 Survey
Questions For
Arizona Candidates |
|
|
|
Position Sought:
U.S. House of
Representatives CD-5 |
|
|
|
Question
6:
Amending the United States Constitution
to
define
marriage
as
between
only one
man and
one
woman. |
|
|
Candidates'
Position:
Support. |
|
|
|
Question
7:
Repealing the federal
Defense
of
Marriage
Act
which
states
marriage
is the
union of
one man
and one
woman
and
declares
states
do not
have to
recognize
same-sex
marriages
from
other
states. |
|
|
Candidates'
Position:
Oppose.
|
|
|
|
Question
10:
Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender
identity,”
or
“gender
expression”
to the
protected
classes
of race,
religion,
age,
sex, and
ancestry
in
discrimination
law. |
|
|
Candidates'
Position:
Oppose. |
|
|
|
Question
10:
Expanding federal “hate
crime”
laws to
include
“sexual
orientation,”
“gender
identity,”
or
“gender
expression.” |
|
|
|
Candidates'
Position:
Oppose. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
