|
Michelle Udall |
|
|
|
Republican Michelle
Udall was a member
of the Arizona House
of Representatives,
representing
District 25. She
assumed office on
January 9, 2017. She
left office on
January 9, 2023.
Udall ran for
election for Arizona
Superintendent of
Public Instruction.
She lost in the
Republican primary
on August 2, 2022. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In other words, as PROVEN by this bill, Republicans and ammosexuals find it wrong to discriminate against inanimate objects but have no problem discriminating against people. |
|
|
|
|
|
Center for Arizona Policy |
2020 Survey Questions For Arizona Candidates |
|
Position Sought: State Representative LD-25 |
|
Question 2: Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” or “gender expression” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in nondiscrimination law. |
|
Candidates' Position: Oppose. |
|
Question 4: Allowing biological males that identify as transgender to play on female sports’ teams. |
|
Candidates' Position: Oppose |
|
Question 9: Protecting a parent's right to seek professional counseling for their minor child with same-sex attraction or gender identity issues to help them reach their desired outcome.* |
|
Candidates' Position: Support |
|
Question 11: Protecting individuals and businesses from being required to provide services or use their artistic expression in a manner that violates their moral or religious beliefs.** |
|
Candidates' Position: Support. |
|
* This is in reference to the dangerous and disproven "Reparative Therapy". |
**Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Battle Lines
Drawn In
Arizona Gay
Discrimination
Case |
Dec. 24,
2018 |
|
|
|
|
Center for Arizona Policy |
2014 Candidate Questionnaire |
|
Position Sought: State Representative LD-25 |
|
Question 9: Arizona’s voter-approved constitutional definition of marriage should be defended to the fullest extent legally possible. |
|
Candidates' Position: Support |
|
Question 11: Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” or “gender expression” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in antidiscrimination law. |
|
Candidates' Position: Oppose |
|
Question 15: Protecting individuals and businesses from being required to provide services or use their artistic expression in a manner that violates their moral or religious beliefs.* |
|
Candidates' Position: Support |
|
* Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michelle
Udall: Bring
Back Prayer
To Mesa
Public Board
Meetings |
Jan. 22,
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|