|
James Weiers |
|
|
|
Republican James Weiers was a member of the Arizona Senate and the Arizona House
of Representatives, representing various Arizona
Legislative Districts. He was initially elected to
the House in 1994, where he served as one of the two
District 16 representatives from January 1995
through January 2003. In 2002, he ran and won the
seat for the Arizona State Senate for District 10,
which was similar to the prior District 16 after
redistricting. He served in the Senate for one term,
from January 2003 through January 2005. In 2004, he
ran successfully for the House, again in District
10. He was re-elected three more times to represent
the House, serving from January 2005 through January
2013. He served twice as Speaker of the House, the
first time from 2001–2002, and the second time from
2005–2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
PLEASE NOTE: A "Yes" vote would allow ranch dogs to be neglected or abandoned, killed and tortured. It would allow the owner of a ranch dog to inflict unnecessary injury to the animal and not provide medical attention. |
|
|
|
|
Art Vitasek,
Representative
Jim Weiers'
Favorite
Pedophile,
Is Heading
To
Prison...For
559 Years |
Jan. 13,
2012 |
|
|
|
State
Representative
Jim Weiers
Won't
Explain
Reported
Role In SCA
Criminal
Investigation |
Apr. 19,
2011 |
|
|
|
Rep. Jim
Weiers To
Predatory
Lenders: ‘I
Can’t Quit
You!’ |
Feb. 12,
2011 |
|
|
|
|
Center for Arizona Policy |
2010 Candidate Questionnaire |
|
Position Sought: State Representative LD-10 |
|
Question 9: Amending the United States Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. |
|
Candidates' Position: Support |
|
Question 12: Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” or “gender expression” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in nondiscrimination law. |
|
Candidates' Position: Oppose |
|
Question 15: Protecting professionals from being required to provide services that violate their moral or religious beliefs.* |
|
Candidates' Position: Support |
|
* Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Center for Arizona Policy |
2008 Survey Questions For Arizona Candidates |
|
Position Sought: State Representative LD-10 |
|
Question 7: Amending the United States Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. |
|
Candidates' Position: Support. |
|
Question 8: . Adding “sexual orientation” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in antidiscrimination law. |
|
Candidates' Position: Oppose. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Center for Arizona Policy |
2006 Survey Questions For Arizona Candidates |
|
Position Sought: State Representative LD-10 |
|
Question 7: Amending the United States Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. |
|
Candidates' Position: Support. |
|
Question 8: . Adding “sexual orientation” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in antidiscrimination law. |
|
Candidates' Position: Oppose. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|