|
Justin Olson |
|
|
 |
|
Republican member of the
Arizona Corporation Commission. Olson is a
former member of the Arizona House of
Representatives representing District 25
from January 14, 2013, until 2017. |
Sources:
Wikipedia,
Ballotpedia & Vote
Smart |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
2022
Candidate
Questionnaire |
 |
Position Sought:
U.S.
Senate |
 |
Question
4: Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” and “gender expression” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in nondiscrimination law. |
 |
Candidates'
Position: Oppose. |
 |
Question
9: Protecting individuals and businesses from being required to provide services or use their artistic expression in a manner that violates their moral or religious beliefs.* |
 |
Candidates'
Position: Support. |
 |
* Discriminatory
"Religious Freedom" laws. |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
Arizona
Utilities Regulator Justin Olson Enters GOP Senate
Race, Slams Democrats' Spending Proposal As
'Socialist State' |
"As a utility regulator, Olson
nearly succeeded in killing clean energy rules that
could have boosted solar, energy efficiency and
other clean power sources. When the rules were
revived, the requirements were weaker than they
otherwise would have been because of Olson’s
opposition." |
Oct. 13, 2021 |
 |
 |
 |
Arizona Corporation Commissioner Justin Olson Used APS Talking
Points In Call On
Key Issues |
"Arizona Corporation
Commissioner Justin Olson took talking points on
renewable energy and environmental programs provided
by Arizona Public Service Co. and cited them, often
verbatim, to a Wall Street analyst who was seeking
information about his views as a regulator. [...] An
EPI official and one of Olson's political rivals
said the reciting of APS policy positions shows
Olson can't be objective when deciding rates and
other policies for the company." |
Oct. 18, 2018 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
2018
Candidate
Questionnaire |
 |
Position Sought:
Corporation
Commission |
 |
Question
4: Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” or “gender expression” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in nondiscrimination law. |
 |
Candidates'
Position: Oppose. |
 |
Question
9: Protecting a parent’s right to seek professional counseling for their minor child with same– sex attraction or gender identity issues to help them reach their desired outcome.* |
 |
Candidates'
Position: Support. |
 |
*
This is in reference to the
dangerous and disproven
"Reparative Therapy". |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
2016 Survey
Questions For
Arizona Candidates |
 |
Position Sought:
U.S.
House of
Representatives
CD-5 |
 |
Question
4: Protecting individuals and businesses from being required to provide services or use their artistic expression in a manner that violates their moral or religious beliefs.* |
 |
Candidates'
Position: Support. |
 |
Question
9: Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” or “gender expression” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in nondiscrimination law. |
 |
Candidates'
Position: Oppose. |
 |
*
Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws. |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
2014
Candidate
Questionnaire |
 |
Position Sought:
State
Representative
LD-25 |
 |
Question
9: Arizona’s voter-approved constitutional definition of marriage should be defended to the fullest extent legally possible. |
 |
Candidates'
Position: Support |
 |
Question
11: Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” or “gender expression” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in antidiscrimination law. |
 |
Candidates'
Position: Oppose |
 |
Question
15: Protecting individuals and businesses from being required to provide services or use their artistic expression in a manner that violates their moral or religious beliefs.* |
 |
Candidates'
Position: Support |
 |
*
Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws. |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
List Of Arizona Republicans Who Voted For Anti-Gay
Discrimination Bill |
"This goes to show how DIRTY &
ROTTEN Republicans are and how there are no limits
to their heartlessness and callousness." |
Feb. 28, 2014 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
2012
Candidate
Questionnaire |
 |
Position Sought:
State
Representative
LD-25 |
 |
Question
9: Amending the United States Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. |
 |
Candidates'
Position: Support |
 |
Question
11: Adding
“sexual
orientation,”
“gender
identity,”
or
“gender
expression”
to the
protected
classes
of race,
religion,
age,
sex, and
ancestry
in
nondiscrimination
law. |
 |
Candidates'
Position: Oppose |
 |
Question
15: Protecting professionals from being required to provide services that violate their moral or religious beliefs.* |
 |
Candidates'
Position: Support |
 |
*
Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws. |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
Federal
Judge Rules State Can't Cut Planned
Parenthood Funds |
Oct. 22, 2012 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
2010
Candidate
Questionnaire |
 |
Position Sought:
State Representative
LD-19 |
 |
Question
9: Amending the United States Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. |
 |
Candidates'
Position: Support |
 |
Question
12: Adding
“sexual
orientation,”
“gender
identity,”
or
“gender
expression”
to the
protected
classes
of race,
religion,
age,
sex, and
ancestry
in
nondiscrimination
law. |
 |
Candidates'
Position: Oppose |
 |
Question
15: Protecting professionals from being required to provide services that violate their moral or religious beliefs.* |
 |
Candidates'
Position: Support |
 |
*
Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws. |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |