|
|
Justin Olson |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Republican Justin Olson
(Republican Party) was a member of the
Arizona Corporation Commission. He assumed
office in 2017. He left office on January 2,
2023. Olson ran for election to the U.S.
Senate to represent Arizona. He lost in the
Republican primary on August 2, 2022. Olson
sought election to the U.S. House to
represent the 5th Congressional District of
Arizona. He was defeated in the Republican
primary on August 30, 2016. |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
|
2022
Candidate
Questionnaire |
|
|
|
Position Sought:
U.S.
Senate |
|
|
| Question
4: Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” and “gender expression” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in nondiscrimination law. |
 |
| Candidates'
Position: Oppose. |
|
|
| Question
9: Protecting individuals and businesses from being required to provide services or use their artistic expression in a manner that violates their moral or religious beliefs.* |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Support. |
|
|
|
* Discriminatory
"Religious Freedom" laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Arizona
Utilities Regulator Justin Olson Enters GOP Senate
Race, Slams Democrats' Spending Proposal As
'Socialist State' |
|
"As a utility regulator,
Olson
nearly succeeded in killing clean energy rules that
could have boosted solar, energy efficiency and
other clean power sources. When the rules were
revived, the requirements were weaker than they
otherwise would have been because of Olson’s
opposition." |
|
Oct. 13, 2021 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Arizona Corporation Commissioner Justin Olson Used APS Talking
Points In Call On
Key Issues |
|
"Arizona Corporation
Commissioner Justin Olson took talking points on
renewable energy and environmental programs provided
by Arizona Public Service Co. and cited them, often
verbatim, to a Wall Street analyst who was seeking
information about his views as a regulator. [...] An EPI official and one of Olson's political rivals
said the reciting of APS policy positions shows
Olson can't be objective when deciding rates and
other policies for the company." |
|
Oct. 18, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
|
2018
Candidate
Questionnaire |
|
|
|
Position Sought:
Corporation
Commission |
|
|
| Question
4: Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” or “gender expression” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in nondiscrimination law. |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Oppose. |
|
|
| Question
9: Protecting a parent’s right to seek professional counseling for their minor child with same– sex attraction or gender identity issues to help them reach their desired outcome.* |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Support. |
|
|
|
*
This is in reference to the
dangerous and disproven
"Reparative Therapy". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
|
2016 Survey
Questions For
Arizona Candidates |
|
|
|
Position Sought:
U.S.
House of
Representatives
CD-5 |
|
|
| Question
4: Protecting individuals and businesses from being required to provide services or use their artistic expression in a manner that violates their moral or religious beliefs.* |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Support. |
|
|
| Question
9: Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” or “gender expression” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in nondiscrimination law. |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Oppose. |
|
|
|
*
Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
|
2014
Candidate
Questionnaire |
|
|
|
Position Sought:
State
Representative
LD-25 |
|
|
| Question
9: Arizona’s voter-approved constitutional definition of marriage should be defended to the fullest extent legally possible. |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Support |
|
|
| Question
11: Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” or “gender expression” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in antidiscrimination law. |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Oppose |
|
|
| Question
15: Protecting individuals and businesses from being required to provide services or use their artistic expression in a manner that violates their moral or religious beliefs.* |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Support |
|
|
|
*
Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
List Of Arizona Republicans Who Voted For Anti-Gay
Discrimination Bill |
|
"This goes to show how DIRTY &
ROTTEN Republicans are and how there are no limits
to their heartlessness and callousness." |
|
Feb. 28, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
|
2012
Candidate
Questionnaire |
|
|
|
Position Sought:
State
Representative
LD-25 |
|
|
| Question
9: Amending the United States Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Support |
|
|
| Question
11: Adding
“sexual
orientation,”
“gender
identity,”
or
“gender
expression”
to the
protected
classes
of race,
religion,
age,
sex, and
ancestry
in
nondiscrimination
law. |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Oppose |
|
|
| Question
15: Protecting professionals from being required to provide services that violate their moral or religious beliefs.* |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Support |
|
|
|
*
Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
Judge Rules State Can't Cut Planned
Parenthood Funds |
|
Oct. 22, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
PLEASE NOTE:
A "Yes" vote would
allow ranch dogs to
be neglected or
abandoned, killed
and tortured. It
would allow the
owner of a ranch dog
to inflict
unnecessary injury
to the animal and
not provide medical
attention. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
|
2010
Candidate
Questionnaire |
|
|
|
Position Sought:
State Representative
LD-19 |
|
|
| Question
9: Amending the United States Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Support |
|
|
| Question
12: Adding
“sexual
orientation,”
“gender
identity,”
or
“gender
expression”
to the
protected
classes
of race,
religion,
age,
sex, and
ancestry
in
nondiscrimination
law. |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Oppose |
|
|
| Question
15: Protecting professionals from being required to provide services that violate their moral or religious beliefs.* |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Support |
|
|
|
*
Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
