|
Gene Chewning |
|
|
|
Independent
Gene
Chewning was
a candidate
for District
27 of the
Arizona
House of
Representatives.
The primary
election was
on August
24, 2010,
and the
general
election was
on November
2, 2010. He
was defeated
by Sally Ann
Gonzales and
Macario
Saldate in
the general
election
which took
place on
November 2.
Chewning
also ran
(and lost)
in 2006 for
Arizona
House of
Representatives
District 27. |
|
|
|
|
|
Center for Arizona Policy |
2010 Candidate Questionnaire |
|
Position Sought: State Representative LD-1 |
|
Question 9: Amending the United States Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. |
|
Candidates' Position: Support |
|
Question 12: Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” or “gender expression” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in nondiscrimination law. |
|
Candidates' Position: Oppose |
|
Question 15: Protecting professionals from being required to provide services that violate their moral or religious beliefs.* |
|
Candidates' Position: Support |
|
* Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona State Legislative Election 2010 Political Courage Test |
|
Position Sought: State Representative LD-1 |
|
Social Issues: |
|
|
Yes |
|
a) Should marriage only be between one man and one woman? |
|
|
No |
|
c) Do you support the inclusion of sexual orientation in Arizona's anti-discrimination laws? |
|
|
No |
|
d) Do you support the inclusion of gender identity in Arizona's anti-discrimination laws? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Center for Arizona Policy |
2006 Survey Questions For Arizona Candidates |
|
Position Sought: State Representative LD-27 |
|
Question 7: Amending the United States Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. |
|
Candidates' Position: Support |
|
Question 8: . Adding “sexual orientation” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in antidiscrimination law. |
|
Candidates' Position: Oppose |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|