|
Gene Chewning |
|
|
Chewning ran in the 2010 election
for Arizona House of Representatives District 27. He
was defeated by Sally Ann Gonzales and Macario
Saldate in the general election which took place on
November 2. Chewning also ran (and lost) in 2006 for
Arizona House of Representatives District 27. |
Sources:
Wikipedia,
Ballotpedia & Vote
Smart |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
2010
Candidate
Questionnaire |
 |
Position Sought:
State
Representative
LD-1 |
 |
Question
9: Amending the United States Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. |
 |
Candidates'
Position: Support |
 |
Question
12: Adding
“sexual
orientation,”
“gender
identity,”
or
“gender
expression”
to the
protected
classes
of race,
religion,
age,
sex, and
ancestry
in
nondiscrimination
law. |
 |
Candidates'
Position: Oppose |
 |
Question
15: Protecting professionals from being required to provide services that violate their moral or religious beliefs.* |
 |
Candidates'
Position: Support |
 |
*
Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws. |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Arizona
State
Legislative
Election
2010
Political
Courage
Test |
 |
Position Sought:
State
Representative
LD-1 |
 |
Social Issues: |
 |
|
Yes |
 |
a) Should marriage only be between one man and one woman? |
 |
|
No |
 |
c) Do you support the inclusion of sexual orientation in Arizona's anti-discrimination laws? |
 |
|
No |
 |
d) Do you support the inclusion of gender identity in Arizona's anti-discrimination laws? |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
2006 Survey
Questions For
Arizona Candidates |
 |
Position Sought:
State Representative LD-27 |
 |
Question
7:
Amending the United States Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. |
 |
Candidates'
Position:
Support |
 |
Question
8:
. Adding “sexual orientation” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in antidiscrimination law. |
 |
Candidates'
Position:
Oppose |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |