|
|
Denise Ceballos-Viner |
|
|
|
Republican Denise Ceballos Viner
ran for election to the Phoenix City Council to
represent District 8 in Arizona. She lost in the
general election on November 8, 2022. |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Where
Does This Phoenix
City Council Candidate Really Live?
|
|
"Five months ago,
Denise Ceballos-Viner filed her notice of
candidacy for the Phoenix City Council. In
black ink, she penned her pertinent details:
name, date, phone number, mailing address.
But the address on the form, filed with the
city clerk, is to a home she doesn’t own in
South Phoenix. The home she does own, a
Spanish colonial house valued at $800,000
with a well-manicured yard located north of
Carefree Highway, is one of three she’s
purchased with her husband since 2008 in the
upscale Anthem planned community. [...]
Where Ceballos-Viner actually lives is
critical to her campaign. City council
hopefuls “must maintain permanent residence
within the district from which the candidate
is nominated,” according to the city clerk’s
office. It’s a 45-mile drive across several
council districts between the two homes. For
Ceballos-Viner to call District 8 home,
she’d be living off Baseline Road in a
friend's house, while her children and her
husband — Phoenix Police Department
Commander Darren Viner, who runs the Black
Mountain Precinct in north Phoenix — live in
the home in Anthem." |
|
Aug. 12, 2022 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
|
2022 Survey
Questions For
Arizona Candidates |
|
|
|
Position Sought:
Phoenix
City
Council
District
8 |
|
|
|
Question 7: Adding "sexual orientation," "gender identity," or "gender expression" to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in nondiscrimination ordinances. |
 |
| Candidates'
Position: Oppose |
|
|
|
Question 8: Protecting a parent's right to seek professional counseling for their minor child with same-sex attraction or gender identity issues to help them reach their desired outcome.* |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Support |
|
|
|
Question 10:
Protecting individuals and
businesses from being required
to provide services or use their
artistic expression in a manner
that violates their moral or
religious beliefs.** |
|
|
|
Candidates' Position:
Support. |
|
|
|
*
This is in reference to the
dangerous and disproven
"Reparative Therapy". |
|
**Discriminatory
"Religious Freedom" laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
