Carl Seel

Carl Seel

VOTING RECORD

Former Republican member of the Arizona House of Representatives representing District 20 from 2013 to 2015. Seel served consecutively from January 2009 until January 14, 2013, in the District 6 seat.

Sources: Wikipedia, Ballotpedia & Vote Smart

Carl Seel, Constable Who Failed To Serve Orders Of Protection, Resigns His Post

"Seel faced a complaint with the Constable Ethics, Standards and Training Board earlier this year alleging his failure to serve the orders of protection over a nine month period. He claimed it was because he wasn’t properly trained on the AZPoint system that constables use for their work. "

May 19, 2022

Birther, Minuteman, And Ex-Chris Simcox Supporter Carl Seel Is Running For Justice Of The Peace

Aug. 5, 2016

Center for Arizona Policy

2014 Candidate Questionnaire

Position Sought: State Representative LD-20

Question 9: Arizona’s voter-approved constitutional definition of marriage should be defended to the fullest extent legally possible.

Candidates' Position: Support

Question 11: Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” or “gender expression” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in antidiscrimination law.

Candidates' Position: Oppose

Question 15: Protecting individuals and businesses from being required to provide services or use their artistic expression in a manner that violates their moral or religious beliefs.*

Candidates' Position: Support

* Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws.

Source

List Of Arizona Republicans Who Voted For Anti-Gay Discrimination Bill

Feb. 28, 2014


02/20/2014	Authorizes Individuals to use Potential	Yes
	Infringements of Religious Freedom as a
	Claim or Defense

SB-1062 - SB 1062 was an Arizona bill to amend an existing law to give any individual or legal entity an exemption from any state law if it substantially burdened their exercise of religion, including Arizona law requiring public accommodation.

Source

Headlights:

It would allow anyone to assert a legal claim or defense of free exercise of religion in a legal proceeding, regardless of whether the government is a party to the proceeding.

It would allow private individuals and corporations to assert religious beliefs in a way that could lead to discrimination against gay and lesbian, and other, Arizonans. This bill could embolden people to discriminate against anyone who doesn’t share their beliefs or religious practices.

If SB 1062 were enacted, employers could impose their religious beliefs on employees and businesses could refuse to serve customers despite state and local laws requiring public accommodations—like restaurants and hotels—to serve all people

AZ House Bill 2192 Would Make It Illegal For Undocumented Immigrants To Use Public Resources

Feb. 5, 2014

Constantin Querard's Taxpayer-Paid Bootlickers David Gowan, Steve Montenegro, Carl Seel, Steve Smith, And Kelly Townsend Do Their Master's Bidding

Feb. 26, 2013

Atheist? Not If You Want To Finish High School In Arizona

Jan. 26, 2013

Bill Would Require Non-Insured To Show Papers At Hospital

Jan. 23, 2013

Arizona Republicans Push Their Own Gun Secession Bill

Jan. 21,2013

HB-2780 - Vote to concur with Senate amendments and pass a bill that exempts ranch dogs involved in shepherding or herding livestock from animal protection laws.

Highlights:

		Defines “cruelty to animals” as certain actions including, but not limited to, the following:
		-Neglect or abandonment;
		-Failure to provide medical attention;
		-Infliction of unnecessary personal injury to the animal;
		-Torture; and
		-Killing the animal.

PLEASE NOTE: A "Yes" vote would allow ranch dogs to be neglected or abandoned, killed and tortured. It would allow the owner of a ranch dog to inflict unnecessary injury to the animal and not provide medical attention.

Source

Center for Arizona Policy

2012 Candidate Questionnaire

Position Sought: State Senate LD-20

Question 9: Amending the United States Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman.

Candidates' Position: Support

Question 11: Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” or “gender expression” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in nondiscrimination law.

Candidates' Position: Oppose

Question 15: Protecting professionals from being required to provide services that violate their moral or religious beliefs.*

Candidates' Position: Support

* Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws.

Source

Carl Seel Heads Prominent List Of “Kooks” In Arizona Politics!

Aug. 6, 2012

Carl Seel's "Birther" Bill: Voter Protection Or Conspiracy-Theory Nonsense?

Mar. 28, 2012

KPHO Channel 5 Arizona Airs Story On Rep. Seel’s Principal Reduction

May 12, 2011

Arizona Lawmakers Pass Presidential 'Birther' Bill

Apr. 16, 2011

Center for Arizona Policy

2010 Candidate Questionnaire

Position Sought: State Representative LD-6

Question 9: Amending the United States Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman.

Candidates' Position: Support

Question 12: Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” or “gender expression” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in nondiscrimination law.

Candidates' Position: Oppose

Question 15: Protecting professionals from being required to provide services that violate their moral or religious beliefs.*

Candidates' Position: Support

* Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws.

Source

Arizona's Photo Radar-The Daily Show With Jon Stewart

Jul. 8, 2010

Center for Arizona Policy

2008 Candidate Questionnaire

Position Sought: State Representative LD-6

Question 7: Amending the United States Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman.

Candidates' Position: Support.

Question 8: . Adding “sexual orientation” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in antidiscrimination law.

Candidates' Position: Oppose.

Source

Center for Arizona Policy

2006 Candidate Questionnaire

Position Sought: State Representative LD-6

Question 7: Amending the United States Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman.

Candidates' Position: Support.

Question 8: . Adding “sexual orientation” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in antidiscrimination law.

Candidates' Position: Oppose.

Source

PAID FOR BY STONEWALL DEMOCRATS OF ARIZONA • NOT AUTHORIZED BY ANY CANDIDATE OR CANDIDATE'S COMMITTEE

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Fair Use Notice