Carl Seel

 

 
Former Republican member of the Arizona House of Representatives representing District 20 from 2013 to 2015. Seel served consecutively from January 2009 until January 14, 2013, in the District 6 seat.

Sources: Wikipedia, Ballotpedia & Vote Smart

Carl Seel, Constable Who Failed To Serve Orders Of Protection, Resigns His Post
"Seel faced a complaint with the Constable Ethics, Standards and Training Board earlier this year alleging his failure to serve the orders of protection over a nine month period. He claimed it was because he wasn’t properly trained on the AZPoint system that constables use for their work. "
May 19, 2022
Birther, Minuteman, And Ex-Chris Simcox Supporter Carl Seel Is Running For Justice Of The Peace
Aug. 5, 2016
Center for Arizona Policy
2014 Candidate Questionnaire
Position Sought: State Representative LD-20
Question 9: Arizona’s voter-approved constitutional definition of marriage should be defended to the fullest extent legally possible.
Candidates' Position: Support
Question 11: Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” or “gender expression” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in antidiscrimination law.
Candidates' Position: Oppose
Question 15: Protecting individuals and businesses from being required to provide services or use their artistic expression in a manner that violates their moral or religious beliefs.*
Candidates' Position: Support
* Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws.
List Of Arizona Republicans Who Voted For Anti-Gay Discrimination Bill
Feb. 28, 2014

 

  02/20/2014 Authorizes Individuals to use Potential Yes
    Infringements of Religious Freedom as a  
    Claim or Defense  
       
SB-1062 - SB 1062 was an Arizona bill to amend an existing law to give any individual or legal entity an exemption from any state law if it substantially burdened their exercise of religion, including Arizona law requiring public accommodation.

Source

Headlights:
  • It would allow anyone to assert a legal claim or defense of free exercise of religion in a legal proceeding, regardless of whether the government is a party to the proceeding.
  • It would allow private individuals and corporations to assert religious beliefs in a way that could lead to discrimination against gay and lesbian, and other, Arizonans. This bill could embolden people to discriminate against anyone who doesn’t share their beliefs or religious practices.
  • If SB 1062 were enacted, employers could impose their religious beliefs on employees and businesses could refuse to serve customers despite state and local laws requiring public accommodations—like restaurants and hotels—to serve all people
AZ House Bill 2192 Would Make It Illegal For Undocumented Immigrants To Use Public Resources
Feb. 5, 2014
Constantin Querard's Taxpayer-Paid Bootlickers David Gowan, Steve Montenegro, Carl Seel, Steve Smith, And Kelly Townsend Do Their Master's Bidding
Feb. 26, 2013
Atheist? Not If You Want To Finish High School In Arizona
Jan. 26, 2013
Bill Would Require Non-Insured To Show Papers At Hospital
Jan. 23, 2013
Arizona Republicans Push Their Own Gun Secession Bill
Jan. 21,2013

 

HB-2780 - Vote to concur with Senate amendments and pass a bill that exempts ranch dogs involved in shepherding or herding livestock from animal protection laws.
Highlights:
 

Defines “cruelty to animals” as certain actions including, but not limited to, the following:
    -Neglect or abandonment;
    -Failure to provide medical attention;
    -Infliction of unnecessary personal injury to the animal;
    -Torture; and
    -Killing the animal.
PLEASE NOTE:  A "Yes" vote would allow ranch dogs to be neglected or abandoned, killed and tortured. It would allow the  owner of a ranch dog to inflict unnecessary injury to the animal and not provide medical attention.

Source

Center for Arizona Policy
2012 Candidate Questionnaire
Position Sought: State Senate LD-20
Question 9: Amending the United States Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
Candidates' Position: Support
Question 11: Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” or “gender expression” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in nondiscrimination law.
Candidates' Position: Oppose
Question 15: Protecting professionals from being required to provide services that violate their moral or religious beliefs.*
Candidates' Position: Support
* Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws.
Carl Seel Heads Prominent List Of “Kooks” In Arizona Politics!
Aug. 6, 2012
Carl Seel's "Birther" Bill: Voter Protection Or Conspiracy-Theory Nonsense?
Mar. 28, 2012
KPHO Channel 5 Arizona Airs Story On Rep. Seel’s Principal Reduction
May 12, 2011
Arizona Lawmakers Pass Presidential 'Birther' Bill
Apr. 16, 2011
Center for Arizona Policy
2010 Candidate Questionnaire
Position Sought: State Representative LD-6
Question 9: Amending the United States Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
Candidates' Position: Support
Question 12: Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” or “gender expression” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in nondiscrimination law.
Candidates' Position: Oppose
Question 15: Protecting professionals from being required to provide services that violate their moral or religious beliefs.*
Candidates' Position: Support
* Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws.
Arizona's Photo Radar-The Daily Show With Jon Stewart
Jul. 8, 2010
Center for Arizona Policy
2008 Candidate Questionnaire
Position Sought: State Representative LD-6
Question 7: Amending the United States Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
Candidates' Position: Support.
Question 8: . Adding “sexual orientation” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in antidiscrimination law.
Candidates' Position: Oppose.
Center for Arizona Policy
2006 Candidate Questionnaire
Position Sought: State Representative LD-6
Question 7: Amending the United States Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
Candidates' Position: Support.
Question 8: . Adding “sexual orientation” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in antidiscrimination law.
Candidates' Position: Oppose.

PAID FOR BY STONEWALL DEMOCRATS OF ARIZONA • NOT AUTHORIZED BY ANY CANDIDATE OR CANDIDATE'S COMMITTEE
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 87222, Tucson, Arizona 85754 | Email: stonewalldemsaz@gmail.com
All Original Content Copyright ©2022 Stonewall Democrats of Arizona. All Rights Reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service  |  Fair Use Notice