|
|
|
Amanda Reeve |
|
|
 |
 |
|
Republican Amanda
Reeve is a former
member of the
Arizona House of
Representatives,
representing the 6th
District from
February 2010 to
2013. She was
appointed in
February 2010 to
fill the vacancy
left by the
resignation of
Sam Crump. Reeve ran for
re-election in the
2012 election for
Arizona House of
Representatives
District 28. She and
incumbent Kate Brophy McGee ran
unopposed in the
Republican primary
on August 28, 2012.
She was defeated in
the general
election, which took
place on November 6,
2012. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Arizona ALEC
Politicians
-
SourceWatch |
|
Sep. 21,
2018 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
PLEASE NOTE: A "Yes" vote would allow ranch dogs to be neglected or abandoned, killed and tortured. It would allow the owner of a ranch dog to inflict unnecessary injury to the animal and not provide medical attention. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Center for Arizona Policy |
| 2012 Candidate Questionnaire |
|
| Position Sought: State Representative LD-28 |
|
| Question 9: Amending the United States Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. |
 |
| Candidates' Position: Support |
|
| Question 11: Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” or “gender expression” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in nondiscrimination law. |
|
| Candidates' Position: Oppose |
|
| Question 15: Protecting professionals from being required to provide services that violate their moral or religious beliefs.* |
|
| Candidates' Position: Support |
|
| * Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Center for Arizona Policy |
| 2010 Candidate Questionnaire |
|
| Position Sought: State Representative LD-6 |
|
| Question 9: Amending the United States Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. |
|
| Candidates' Position: Support |
|
| Question 12: Adding “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” or “gender expression” to the protected classes of race, religion, age, sex, and ancestry in nondiscrimination law. |
|
| Candidates' Position: Oppose |
|
| Question 15: Protecting professionals from being required to provide services that violate their moral or religious beliefs.* |
|
| Candidates' Position: Support |
|
| * Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
