|
|
Amanda Reeve |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Former Republican
member of the
Arizona House of
Representatives,
representing the 6th
District from
February 2010 to
2013. She was
appointed in
February 2010 to
fill the vacancy
left by the
resignation of Sam
Crump. Reeve ran for
re-election in the
2012 election for
Arizona House of
Representatives
District 28. She and
incumbent Kate
Brophy McGee ran
unopposed in the
Republican primary
on August 28, 2012.
She was defeated in
the general
election, which took
place on November 6,
2012. |
|
|
|
Sources:
Wikipedia,
Ballotpedia & Vote
Smart |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona ALEC Politicians - SourceWatch |
|
Sep. 21, 2018 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
|
2012
Candidate
Questionnaire |
|
|
|
Position Sought:
State
Representative
LD-28 |
|
|
| Question
9: Amending the United States Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. |
 |
| Candidates'
Position: Support |
|
|
| Question
11: Adding
“sexual
orientation,”
“gender
identity,”
or
“gender
expression”
to the
protected
classes
of race,
religion,
age,
sex, and
ancestry
in
nondiscrimination
law. |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Oppose |
|
|
| Question
15: Protecting professionals from being required to provide services that violate their moral or religious beliefs.* |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Support |
|
|
|
*
Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Center
for
Arizona
Policy |
|
2010
Candidate
Questionnaire |
|
|
|
Position Sought:
State
Representative
LD-6 |
|
|
| Question
9: Amending the United States Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Support |
|
|
| Question
12: Adding
“sexual
orientation,”
“gender
identity,”
or
“gender
expression”
to the
protected
classes
of race,
religion,
age,
sex, and
ancestry
in
nondiscrimination
law. |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Oppose |
|
|
| Question
15: Protecting professionals from being required to provide services that violate their moral or religious beliefs.* |
|
| Candidates'
Position: Support |
|
|
|
*
Discriminatory "Religious Freedom" laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
